\nShe is acquitted from court which was false narrative of Hindu terrorism now you don’t trust judiciary also ? \u0939\u093f\u0902\u0926\u0942 \u0915\u092d\u0940 \u0905\u0915\u094d\u0930\u093e\u0902\u0924\u093e \u0928\u0939\u0940\u0902 \u0930\u0939\u0947 \u0907\u0924\u093f\u0939\u093e\u0938 \u0917\u0935\u093e\u0939 \u0939\u0948 \u0964\u091f\u093e\u0907\u092e \u092a\u093e\u0938 \u0915\u0947 \u0932\u093f\u090f \u0915\u0941\u091b \u092d\u0940 \u0928 \u0932\u093f\u0916\u0947 \u0964 \u092b\u093f\u0930 \u0906\u092a \u092a\u0921\u093c\u094b\u0938\u0940 \u0926\u0947\u0936 \u092e\u0947\u0902 superStar \u092c\u0928 \u091c\u093e\u0924\u0947\u0902 \u0939\u0948\u0902 \u0964 https:\/\/t.co\/RhG0xogkH3<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 Amish Devgan (@AMISHDEVGAN) April 17, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Devgan’s tweet has been retweeted over 5000 times and ‘liked’ over 13000 times since he posted it on April 17. Apart from Devgan, several prominent pro-BJP handles have tweeted saying Sadhvi Pragya has been acquitted in the Malegaon blasts case.<\/p>\n
\nKanhaiya is ‘innocent’ until proven guilty but Sadhvi Pragya, who has been acquitted in the Malegaon blast case, is still an ‘accused’.
\nIs vibrator battery down?? pic.twitter.com\/LvpzO5dCvk<\/a><\/p>\n\u2014 Chowkidar Saffronista (@MsKaushik_) April 17, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The above tweet has been retweeted over 900 times so far. Other prominent handles which made the same assertion include RituRathaur<\/em><\/a> and desimojito<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n
\nLiberals who signed petititons for terrorists Yakub Menon & Kasab r having severe meltdown ovr BJP giving ticket to Sadhvi pragya
\nFact that she was kept in jail for 8yrs without evn a chargesheet,was given 4th degree torture,that she is acquitted by court means nothing to them!<\/p>\n\u2014 Ritu (\u0938\u0924\u094d\u092f\u0938\u093e\u0927\u0915)\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf3 (@RituRathaur) April 17, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Sadhvi Pragya has NOT been acquitted\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n
An acquittal means a judgement which absolves an individual accused of a crime. The person in question is declared not guilty via a judgement. While the same could be challenged in a higher court (if the verdict has been delivered by a lower court), an acquittal is essentially an affirmation of non-guilt.\u00a0 In the case of Sadhvi Pragya, it may be noted there has been no acquittal<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
Sadhvi Pragya is currently out on bail. She was granted bail on health grounds. According to the bail order<\/a> given by a Bombay High Court bench headed by Justices Shalini Phansalkar Joshi and Ranjit More, Sadhavi Pragya was given bail because she was “suffering from breast cancer”<\/em> and was “cannot even walk without support”<\/em>.<\/p>\n
The trial of Sadhvi Pragya and others, accused in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, is still underway. Pragya has been charged under various sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. In December 2017, a special NIA court had ruled that Sadhvi Pragya, Lt. Col Prashant Purohit and six others be charged under the UAPA.<\/a><\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.altnews.in\/english-clone-2026\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/10\/2019\/04\/pragya.jpg\")
<\/p>\n