{"id":35075,"date":"2019-05-01T21:55:13","date_gmt":"2019-05-01T16:25:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.altnews.in\/english-clone-2026\/?p=35075"},"modified":"2019-05-02T14:12:06","modified_gmt":"2019-05-02T08:42:06","slug":"amartya-sen-and-nalanda-university-debunking-a-web-of-untruths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.altnews.in\/english-clone-2026\/amartya-sen-and-nalanda-university-debunking-a-web-of-untruths\/","title":{"rendered":"Amartya Sen and Nalanda University: Debunking a web of untruths"},"content":{"rendered":"

In a series of tweets, Bharti Jain, a journalist with\u00a0<\/em>Times of India<\/em> made serious allegations of financial misconduct and nepotism against Nobel laureate Amartya Sen and the management of Bihar’s Nalanda University. Her tweets claimed that after Modi\u2019s arrival in 2014, the purported \u201cfraud was stopped and Amartya Sen was thrown out of Nalanda University<\/em>\u201d. Jain ascribed this as a motive behind Professor Sen\u2019s criticism of the Prime Minister’s economic policies.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

After a social media uproar regarding a lack of evidence to support her allegations, Jain clarified that her tweets were based on \u201csources\u201d and not authored independently.<\/p>\n

\n

I am not the source of this tweet. Sorry but I should have mentioned \u2018sources\u2019 while tweeting<\/p>\n

\u2014 Bharti Jain (@bhartijainTOI) April 28, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

On being pressed about the alleged “sources”, Jain responded that these were government sources.<\/p>\n

\n

Govt sources<\/p>\n

\u2014 Bharti Jain (@bhartijainTOI) April 28, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A short while later, the journalist deleted her tweets.<\/p>\n

Incidentally, the allegations raised by Jain, ascribed to “government sources”, had been circulating on WhatsApp<\/a> in recent time. They were given little credence until a journalist of a national newspaper decided to share the information, identical to the WhatsApp messages, on social media.<\/p>\n

Jain is Editor, Internal Security at Times of India<\/em> and as per her Twitter bio, she reports on Home Ministry, security affairs, personnel ministry, Election Commission and the Parliament.<\/p>\n

In this report, Alt News attempts to fact-check the barrage of allegations tweeted by Jain against Professor Sen and the Nalanda University. While doing so, apart from its own research, Alt News also reached out to Nobel laureate Amartya Sen.<\/p>\n

Allegation 1<\/h2>\n

“The Economist Amartya Sen was appointed as chairman of Nalanda Mentor Group in 2007 & made first Chancellor of famous Nalanda University(NU) in Bihar by Congress govt in 2012. He enjoyed a salary of *Rs 5 Lakh* per month, tax-free benefits, unaccounted foreign travels, meeting in luxury hotels, power to direct appointments, etc.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Fact Check<\/h3>\n

The issue of Dr Sen\u2019s emoluments was first raised by BJP MP Subramanian Swamy in 2015 when he claimed that Professor Sen drew an annual salary of Rs 50 lakh from Nalanda University. Various media outlets had published details of the University statement<\/a>\u00a0in 2015.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The statement termed the claim \u201cfalse\u201d and stated that Dr Sen had received no salary whatsoever from the Nalanda University and all his work for the University was done in an honorary capacity. It also stated that Dr Sen did not receive any \u201cperquisites\u201d from the University.<\/p>\n

Nalanda University further clarified that the free travel pass was a gift to Dr Sen from the Government of India. Former Prime Minister Vajpayee had presented the pass to celebrate his Nobel Prize.<\/p>\n

In an email response to Alt News, Dr Sen labelled journalist Bharti Jain’s allegations as \u201camazingly false\u201d. He elaborated – \u201cFirst of all, I received from Nalanda no salary whatsoever, and worked for zero remuneration. Second, I had \u201cno tax-free benefits\u201d and there were no \u201cunaccounted foreign travels. Third, I was placed in hotels where the Board meetings were held and where other members of the Board (including representatives of the Ministry of External Affairs – when meeting outside Delhi) typically stayed.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Allegation 2<\/h2>\n

“Nine years during Manmohan Singh’s tenure, Amartya Sen ran Nalanda University while mostly staying abroad. He appointed seven faculties. Made Nalanda University a 5-star hotel.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Fact Check<\/h3>\n

A Chancellor does not \u201crun\u201d a university. Unlike a Vice-Chancellor, a Chancellor is an honorary non-resident position. For instance, Venkaiah Naidu is the Chancellor of Delhi University. Section 14 of the Nalanda University Act (2010) passed by the Indian Parliament lays out the responsibilities of a Chancellor.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Section 15 states that it is the Vice-Chancellor who is the principal academic and executive officer and exercises control over the affairs of the Nalanda University and gives effect to the decisions of all authorities of the University.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\u201cRegarding my presence at Nalanda, I attended all meetings of the Board and regularly visited the campus and the offices of Nalanda University in Rajgir and New Delhi, and had frequent meetings with the faculty and the students at Nalanda University. In common with Chancellors of other universities, the Nalanda Chancellor is not required to live in the campus (in fact, there is no allocated residence for the Chancellor in the Nalanda campus),\u201d<\/em> informed Professor Sen.<\/p>\n

Regarding the appointments made by him, he stated, \u201cit was part of my duty to help in the choice and recruitment of distinguished faculty members, and I tried to discharge my responsibilities as well as I could.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Professor Sen seemed completely baffled by the accusation of making the Nalanda University a 5-star hotel. He responded, \u201cI cannot guess what Ms Bharti Jain could possibly mean by making \u201cNalanda University a 5-star hotel.\u201d We had no hotel facilities in Nalanda University – the Board members, when visiting, were placed in nearby hotels.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Allegation 3<\/h2>\n

“Total expenditure was staggering *Rs 2729 crores*”<\/em><\/p>\n

Fact Check<\/h3>\n

While making this claim, Jain seemed to have confused the total budget set aside by the Government of India for establishing and running the Nalanda University with the actual expenditure made during Professor Sen\u2019s tenure.<\/p>\n

A question on the Nalanda University\u2019s budget and expenditure was raised in Lok Sabha in April 2015. Minister of State for External Affairs Gen. VK Singh\u2019s response<\/a> to it was as follows – \u201cAn amount of Rs. 2727.10 crore has been approved by the Government for the establishment of Nalanda University, of which Rs. 47.28 crore has been released till date.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"Professor Sen’s response to Alt News was also on similar lines – \u201cThe planning, preparation and initiation of the new campus of Nalanda, being built on more than 500 acres of vacant land, started when I was Chancellor. Ms Jain has to distinguish between current expenditure and long-term investment.\u201d\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Allegation 4<\/h2>\n

“Four female faculties, Dr Gopa Sabharwal, Dr Anjana Sharma, Nayanjot Lahiri and Upinder Singh from Delhi University were made faculties. *Upinder Singh is the eldest daughter of Manmohan Singh*, while the remaining three were Upinder’s close friends.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Fact Check<\/h3>\n

Alt News’s fact-check found that Sabharwal was the Vice-Chancellor of the Nalanda University and Sharma was the Dean of Academic Planning, however, no reference could be found in the annual reports of the University regarding Lahiri and Singh.<\/p>\n

Alt News reached out to Professor Nayanjyot Lahiri who categorically denied any association with the University. In an email response to Alt News, she stated, \u201cActually, during the time that Professor Sen was the Chancellor, I served at the University of Delhi as Professor of History and for, a few years, as Dean of Colleges. At no point did I happen to be part of the faculty at Nalanda and nor have I earned even a rupee from that University in any capacity whatsoever. After leaving the University of Delhi, I joined Ashoka University in 2016.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Alt News also reached out to Professor Upinder Singh, daughter of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. In a conversation with Alt News, she confirmed that she was never a faculty with Nalanda University, and neither did she receive any remuneration from the University.<\/p>\n

In his email to Alt News, Professor Sen reiterated this point saying, \u201cNeither Upinder Singh (Manmohan Singh\u2019s eldest daughter), nor her friend Nayanjyot Lahiri, was a member of the Nalanda faculty at any time (though given their distinction, they could easily have been appointed at Nalanda, as they had been at Delhi University \u2013 they did not seek appointment in Nalanda).\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Allegation 5<\/h2>\n

“Two more faculties were appointed, honorary, Daman Singh & Amrit Singh. *Middle & youngest daughters of Manmohan Singh. They stayed in USA while drawing salary!”<\/em><\/p>\n

Fact Check<\/h3>\n

Interestingly, while the rest of the tweet thread is now deleted by Jain, this tweet can still be seen on her timeline.<\/p>\n

\n

Two more faculties were appointed, honorary, Daman Singh & Amrit Singh. Middle & youngest daughters of Manmohan Singh..They stayed in USA while drawing salary<\/p>\n

\u2014 Bharti Jain (@bhartijainTOI) April 28, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In this tweet, she makes a serious allegation of fraud and the complicity of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh by saying that his daughters were drawing a salary from the University as faculty members while staying in the US.<\/p>\n

Jain was called out by several people, including senior journalist at The Hindu<\/em> Suhasini Haider who claimed to have checked the allegation and found that both the daughter’s of Singh were never faculty members at the University at any point in time and one of them did not live in the US.<\/p>\n

\n

Bharti, please do check on your sources on this claim. Since it was coming from you, I made an effort to check, and neither people you named have been faculty at the University, and one of them doesn’t live in the USA at all. I urge you to revise the information.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Suhasini Haidar (@suhasinih) April 29, 2019<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Alt News reached out to Daman Singh, daughter of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. In a conversation with Alt News, Daman Singh stated, “I can confirm that neither I nor my sister Amrit has any connection to Nalanda University<\/em>“.<\/p>\n

Professor Sen responded to this claim stating, \u201cThis is also totally untrue. The two mentioned were never appointed faculty members of Nalanda University (they did not seek such appointment either). The question of their drawing a salary while staying in the USA does not arise (\u201cdrawing salary\u201d for \u201chonorary\u201d appointments raises further questions of truth and falsehood).\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Allegation 6<\/h2>\n

“After 2014, when Modi arrived, all these fraud were stopped and Amartya Sen was thrown out of Nalanda University. Since that day Amartya Sen began his trenchant criticism of Modi’s economic agenda. However, at the world level, he failed to impress any other economist against Modi.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Fact Check<\/h3>\n

The tenure of a Chancellor at the Nalanda University is governed by the Nalanda University Act (2010). According to Section 5(f) of the Act<\/a>, a Chancellor is appointed for a 3-year term.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In response to a question regarding the factors that contributed to the exit of Dr Amartya Sen from the Nalanda University, Minister of State for External Affairs, Gen VK Singh\u2019s response<\/a> was as follows – \u201cProf Amartya Sen was appointed as the First Chancellor of Nalanda University w.e.f. 18th July, 2012 for a period of three years. As his tenure of three years was nearing completion, Prof. Sen had publically declared that he wanted to exclude himself from being considered for continuing as Chancellor of Nalanda University beyond July 2015.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Professor Sen responded to the allegation of being terminated from the University by stating, \u201cIn fact, I did not seek to continue as Chancellor of Nalanda University (even though the Governing Body had re-elected me to remain Chancellor). I was deterred not only by the Modi-government\u2019s hostility to me but also by observing how terribly badly the Modi-government was treating this ancient (Buddhist-origin) university.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Responding to Jain\u2019s claim that he began his criticism of PM Modi\u2019s economic agenda after his exit from Nalanda, Professor Sen said, \u201cI must also point out that I have been criticizing the gigantic blunders in Modi\u2019s economic thinking from much earlier than my departure from Nalanda (indeed from much earlier than becoming Chancellor of Nalanda).\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

Alt News checked for Dr Amartya Sen’s criticism of Narendra Modi before his term as the Prime Minister and found several examples<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

The above fact-check proves from various sources that the viral WhatsApp forward quoted by Bharti Jain was completely baseless. In his email to Alt News, Professor Sen remarked, \u201cFinally, I must say that I am quite impressed to see Ms Jain\u2019s ability to pack in so many big and gross mistakes in so few words.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

While Jain\u2019s tweet thread now stands deleted, the text has been picked up by the fake news ecosystem. Right-wing propaganda website, OpIndia<\/em> has published<\/a> an article on the ‘unholy nexus’ between Sen and Manmohan Singh, quoting Jain\u2019s tweet about the latter\u2019s daughters in the US. The website made no effort to fact-check the claim before making a serious allegation of fraud against a former Prime Minister and a Nobel laureate. The tweet thread has also been copy-pasted<\/a> by several BJP supporters on Facebook to explain “the reason why Sen is a vocal critic of Modi.”<\/p>\n