AAP, BJP, Congress politicise Delhi HC's order to remove Hanuman temple at Chandni Chowk - Alt News
Archit
13th January 2021 / 10:15 pm / Last updated: 16th January 2021
A Hanuman temple in Delhi’s Chandni Chowk was razed in the morning of January 3 as part of a beautification drive. The demolition sparked a political blame game where the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP) accused each other of tearing down the Hindu place of worship. This has been reported by news media including Times Now, The Times of India, and The New Indian Express.
That same day, AAP posted images of its members protesting against the BJP and wrote, “Useless BJP has demolished ancient Hanuman Temple in middle of the night. This action by BJP has hurt the faith of lakhs of people. AAP volunteers protest against this cruelty.” AAP leader and Delhi Jal Board Vice-Chairman Raghav Chadha tweeted criticising the BJP. This was retweeted over 800 times. (archived links 1 and 2)
निक्कमी भाजपा ने चांदनी चौक के प्राचीन हनुमान जी का मंदिर आधी रात में तोड़ दिया। भाजपा के इस कृत्य से लाखो लोगो की आस्था को ठेस पहुंची है।
भाजपा के इस कुकृत्य के खिलाफ आम आदमी पार्टी के कार्यकर्ता ने जोरदार विरोध किया। pic.twitter.com/0ymbOuVall
— Aam Aadmi Party Delhi (@AAPDelhi) January 3, 2021
On January 4, BJP leader Adesh Gupta held a press conference refuting AAP’s allegation. Gupta called the Delhi Chief Minister anti-Hindu and alleged that AAP leader Satyendra Jain who heads the religious committee could have stopped the temple’s demolition. Gupta added that the temple was demolished under a beautification project by the Delhi government. (archived link)
हनुमान जी के मंदिर को तोडना साफ़ दर्शाता है कि मुख्यमंत्री केजरीवाल हिन्दू विरोधी और मंदिर विरोधी हैं। अगर मुख्यमंत्री चाहते तो इस मामले को दिल्ली सरकार की रिलीजियस कमेटी में भेज सकते थे, जिसके अध्यक्ष इनके नेता सत्येंद्र जैन हैं- प्रदेश अध्यक्ष श्री @adeshguptabjp pic.twitter.com/6PHZNxULvY
— BJP Delhi (@BJP4Delhi) January 4, 2021
On January 5, AAP MLA Shri Saurabh Bhardwaj told the press that the temple was demolished at midnight when it was raining. Bhardwaj presented a promissory note that allegedly stated that North DMC said that they are ready to demolish the temple. He questioned the existence of such a document without the alleged knowledge of BJP mayors. He also mentioned NGO Manushi Sangathan filed a writ seeking demolition of the temple. Furthermore, Bhardwaj said that CBI should look into the matter and that this protest will be turned into a people’s movement.
Important press conference by AAP MLA Shri Saurabh Bhardwaj | Live
Important press conference by AAP MLA Shri Saurabh Bhardwaj | Live
Posted by Aam Aadmi Party on Monday, 4 January 2021
Times Now reported on this tiff between AAP and BJP on January 5. At the 43-second mark, Chadha said, “An organisation under BJP demolished the temple. You [BJP] should apologise to devotees of Lord Ram and Hanuman for demolishing the temple. BJP should allot land for the re-establishment of the temple and Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, Lord Hanuman devotee Arvind Kejriwal will make the temple.”
In the same Times Now bulletin, at 1:11 mark BJP member Manoj Tiwari said, “In order to demonstrate faith, he visited a temple during elections. A Hanuman temple of the same faith was demolished and Arvind Kejriwal ji doesn’t make any comments. And his religious committees’ chairman Satyendra Jain sanctioned this activity.”
Congress too was not left behind. On January 12, its Delhi wing tweeted, “Anil Chaudhary head to Lieutenant Governor demanding the restoration of the ancient Hanuman temple.” (archive link)
चाँदनी चोक में तोड़े गए प्राचीन हनुमान मंदिर को पुनः स्थापित करने की मांग को लेकर उपराज्यपाल को ज्ञापन सौंप कर आते हुए दिल्ली कांग्रेस अध्यक्ष @Ch_AnilKumarINC उपाध्यक्ष श्री @mudit_aggarwal पूर्व विधायक श्री @IncBhardwaj डॉ नरेन्द्रनाथ जिलाध्यक्ष मो उस्मान, श्री @hkjindalinc pic.twitter.com/T8Kh1GWlTN
— Delhi Congress (@INCDelhi) January 12, 2021
According to India Legal Live, the decision of the Delhi High Court to remove the Hanuman Temple from Chandni Chowk in Delhi has been challenged in the Supreme Court by Jitendra Singh Vishen through Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain.
This fact check has been divided into four sections. Alt News will establish that AAP, BJP and Congress politicised the court-mandated removal of the Hanuman Temple recognised as encroachment by the Public Works Department (under AAP) and North DMC (under BJP) in 2015.
Alt News was able to pin the exact location of the Hanuman Temple on Google Maps based on a source’s intel who did not wish to be named.
They also shared images of the aftermath of the teardown.
Alt News compared the image on Google Maps and the images by the source and found a visual match.
Based on this verification and our conversations with residents of Chandni Chowk, it is abundantly clear that the hanuman temple is indeed located in the middle of a road.
The Indian Express reported that the temple was demolished on January 3 at 7 am. Additionally, Alt News spoke with the concerned police station’s SHO, a Delhi-based reporter and multiple people in Chandni Chowk — none of them stated that the temple was demolished at midnight, which means that AAP’s claim is false.
On January 6, Delhi-based priest Ashok Kumar told The Print that they want the temple to be rebuilt at the same location. On January 12, Delhi Congress moved a memorandum to the Lieutenant Governor seeking the same. Readers should note that there are multiple Hanuman temples near the demolished temple, as per Google Maps.
The idea to make Chandni Chowk a vehicle-free zone was first floated in a redevelopment plan conceived in 2003-04 by the then Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit. In 2010, The Hindu reported that the Delhi High Court asked the Delhi government, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Delhi police to constitute a joint Special Task Force (STF) to explore all questions pertaining to traffic in the capital. AAP was still two years away from being formally launched.
As per The Hindu, the task force focused minimising congestion, reducing pollution levels of motor vehicles and ensuring equitable access to all classes of vehicles that ply on the roads, including non-motorised transport such as bicycles and cycle-rickshaws.
Over a decade later, the Delhi government failed to control excessive road traffic and the capital emerged as one of the most post polluted cities in the world. In 2017, The Hindu reported that the North Corporation, PWD, and Delhi Metro couldn’t reach a consensus on many issues including usage of electric buses and whether commercial vehicles should be allowed into Chandni Chowk.
In 2020, The Times of India reported that the delay in the removal of five unauthorised religious structures has caused a derailed the Chandini Chowk pedestrianisation project. Sanjay Bhargav, President, Chandni Chowk Sarv Vyapar Mandal, told TOI that all illegal structures and encroachments had to be removed for the pedestrianisation project to be successful.
Alt News reached out to advocate Indira Unninayar as the controversy is related to a writ petition (WP) filed by her client Manushi Sangathan in 2007, an organisation founded by Madhu Purnima Kishwar. Our requests to interview Kishwar were turned down.
Alt News: What was the writ petition about?
Unninayar: The PIL sought realisation and effectuation of the rights of cycle rickshaw/ NMV (Non-Motorized Vehicle) pliers. The petition sought equitable access to road space for them, and it was moved after a ban on cycle rickshaws in Delhi by the then MCD in another case called Hemraj & Ors. It challenged some of the obsolete and arbitrary by-laws of the MCD including one that required the owner of the cycle rickshaw to also be its plier and an arbitrary ceiling of 99,000 on the number of cycle rickshaws in Delhi. There had been a separate municipal order in 2006 banning cycle rickshaws in Chandni Chowk as well, hence that order was challenged too. The matter was filed in 2007 by way of the writ petition WP(C) 4572/2007 which was upheld by the Supreme Court in 2012.
Over a period of time, an intervenor in the case CCVM (Chandni Chowk Vyapar Mandal), pressed for the court to focus on Chandni Chowk redevelopment and the case came to be broadly divided into two — the holistic improvements all over Delhi and some specific improvements in Chandni Chowk. The latter came to be known as the Chandni Chowk/ Shahjahanabad Redevelopment Plan.
Alt News: What was the reason behind the delay in the removal of encroachment in Chandni Chowk?
Unninayar: The North DMC contested its responsibility of encroachment removal in April 2015 claiming that it had handed over these roads to the PWD or Delhi Govt. It took the Supreme Court’s confirmation of what the Delhi High Court had already clarified in its order that S 298 of the DMC Act vests streets in the municipality’s care and therefore requires it to remove encroachments. The order clarified that it would, of course, require the cooperation of the Delhi government authorities (meaning the Delhi police). The North DMC continued to evade implementing the order until yet another order was passed by the Delhi High Court in 2019 which too was challenged before the Supreme Court. In October 2020, the Delhi High Court took suo moto case related to the tardiness in the Shahjahanabad Redevelopment Corpn/ Chandni Chowk Redevelopment. Thus, the delay was the sheer reluctance of the DMC in doing its job. The entire case has witnessed inordinate delays as the government authorities do not see cycle rickshaws, NMVs and equitable access to road space and rights of the poor to share road space equitably as a priority. Even though it is very much a priority in the NUTP (National Urban Transport Policy), Master Plan for Delhi 2021 and the SDG (Street Design Guidelines) 2010, the officials on the ground treat such ideas as unimportant.
Alt News: Why were the religious committee’s alternatives rejected?
Unninayar: GNCTD, through its religious committee, suddenly after four years attempted to retain the Hanuman Temple. The temple had been identified as an encroachment by GNCTD and North DMC. It was rejected by the Delhi High Court because the decision of the religious committee was (1) contrary to earlier High Court orders, (2) not feasible as it would come in the way of orderly implementation of the redevelopment.
Alt News: Who was directed to remove encroachments, including the Hanuman temple, in Chandni Chowk?
Unninayar: The court orders clarified that “the MCD – in the light of Section 299 of the DMC Act is hereby directed to remove the said encroachments by the end of May 2015. Government of NCT of Delhi and the Delhi police shall extend their full cooperation in this regard.” Thus, the responsibility to remove the encroachment was that of the North DMC, and it was clarified that it would receive the necessary cooperation from the Delhi police. This is the support extended to maintain law and order during such encroachment removal actions.
Alt News: AAP MLA Shri Saurabh Bhardwaj stated in a press conference that NGO Manushi Sangathan filed a writ seeking demolition of the temple. Is that true?
Uninayar: The encroachments were identified by the authorities including the North DMC. It is incorrect to say that Manushi Sangathan filed a writ seeking demolition of the temple. It never did that but the case pertained to equitable access to road space for NMVs.
Relevant court orders
Unninayar and her legal team shared the relevant court orders with Alt News that establish —
The following timeline (based on Unninayar’s analysis) lists all crucial details related to the Hanuman Temple controversy along with relevant court orders.
2012
In April 2012, the Supreme Court upheld and the Delhi HC judgement and said, “The Govt. of NCT of Delhi, the MCD, the Delhi Development Authority, the Delhi police, shall constitute a special task force to explore all the questions pertaining to road traffic in Delhi, with the objective of minimizing congestion, reducing pollution levels of motor vehicles, and ensuring equitable access to all classes of vehicles that ply on the roads, including non-motorized transport such as bicycles and cycle rickshaws. The Government of NCT of Delhi shall issue a notification within 6 weeks, for this purpose, and also accord adequate budgetary support for this purpose.”
2015
2016
In March 2016, North DMC submitted a status report before Delhi HC and listed out dimensions of encroachment by the five religious structures, as found in a survey conducted by North DMC.
2018
2019
2020
Conclusion
The Hanuman Temple — technically two temples (Hanuman temple and Shiva temple) — was one of five religious structures. The encroachments were surveyed by both North DMC (under BJP) and PWD (under AAP) which submitted their respective status report in 2015. In 2016, North Delhi Municipal Corporation (North DMC), stated in its status report that the unauthorised Hanuman temple needs to be removed. In April 2015, the Delhi High Court directed North DMC to remove these encroachments as none of the authorities appearing before the court disputed that these were encroachments.
Based on the court orders, it’s evident that the North DMC being the land-owning agency was responsible for the removal of encroachments (including Hanuman temple). After the removal of the unauthorised temple AAP, BJP and Congress politicised the issue by “demanding” re-establishment of the temple which was already ordered by High Court.
In 2018, the Supreme Court stated that the “responsibility to remove the encroachment is primarily of the Municipal Corporation [North DMC]. However, in such endeavour, [Delhi] Government must extend a support to the corporation”. More importantly, none of the government bodies questioned the Hanuman Temple’s encroachment status in court.
Some other misinformation related to the incident include —
1) AAP falsely claimed that the temple was demolished at midnight.
2) AAP MLA Shri Saurabh Bhardwaj falsely stated in a press conference that NGO Manushi Sangathan filed a writ seeking demolition of the temple.
3) The Print publish an erroneous report by PTI that said the Hanuman temple is 100 years old.
Readers should note that this is not the first time such a tiff has happened. Last year in December, The Quint reported that there was a controversy between AAP and North DMC related to renting dues.
Major Surendra Poonia (Retd) tweeted the video of Hanuman Temple at Chandni Chowk being removed and wrote, “If you have courage, try demolishing a Muslim place of worship place located on Delhi’s street.” This video was viewed over 80,000 times. Poonia also posted this video on Facebook with the same claim.
दुःखद😔
केजरीवाल सरकार ने चाँदनी चौक में हनुमान मंदिर को रात के अंधेरे में तुड़वाया !
चुनाव के वक्त ये आदमी हनुमान मंदिर जाने का ढोंग करता है और रात के अंधेरे में मंदिर तुड़वाता है
हिम्मत है तो दिल्ली में सड़कों के बीचों बीच सैंकड़ों मज़ार/मस्जिद हैं…1 भी तुड़वा कर दिखा दो pic.twitter.com/yqkaeGZKJv
— Major Surendra Poonia (@MajorPoonia) January 3, 2021
However, Poonia’s claim is baseless. As per the Ministry of Home Affairs, in 2006 Noor Masjid at Jangpura – B was ordered to be removed by Delhi High Court vide order No. 9358/2006. In 2019, BJP MP Parvesh Verma submitted a list of 54 mosques and graveyards which allegedly existed in an unauthorised manner to Delhi’s Lieutenant-Governor Anil Baijal.
🙏 Blessed to have worked as a fact-checking journalist from November 2019 to February 2023.
Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi recently performed aarti at the Narmada Ghat in Madhya Pradesh’s Omkareshwar…
Following Saudi Arabia’s 2-1 win against Argentina in the ongoing FIFA World Cup, speculation about…
In the wake of the alleged murder of Shraddha Walkar by his partner Aftab Amin…
The CCTV footage of a man violently flinging a child on the ground has created…
The video of a group of people stopping an e-rickshaw with BJP flags attached to…