Over the course of a 2-part article, Alt News documented 15 cases where the TrueIndology twitter account has fabricated history via tools such as photo-shop, fake/misleading pictures and a fertile imagination. In TrueIndology’s WordPress blog post, some of our claims had been contested. Strangely, TrueIndology deleted this defence from his WordPress blog. This piece will look at how Trueindology’s contestations are self-defeating and we will also regale our readers with some more of TrueIndology’s fakery. Finally, we will see the social media reactions in support of TrueIndology.

Let’s start with some more of TrueIndology’s fakery. Since this is a continuation of our last article (Link to Part 1 & Part 2), we have started the numbering of the cases from where we left off last time.

Case 16

Claim: Badshah Khan was opposed to Muslim league and Pakistan. On 12 August 1948, Pakistan fired upon his unarmed party men (Khudai Khidmatgar) killing 600.

trueindology-badshah-khan

Reality: The picture in TrueIndology’s tweet is a photo-shopped version of the scene from a 1982 movie called Gandhi which was produced and directed by Richard Attenborough. The scene itself depicts the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.

TrueIndology Badhsha Khan Jallianwala Bagh massacre

The above scene can be seen in this YouTube video clip at exactly 3 minutes and 40 seconds, a screenshot of which is reproduced below.

Gandhi 1982 Jallianwala Bagh massacre

While the Babrra Massacre did happen, the picture used in this case is no way related to the massacre.

Case 17

Claim: In 1931, when congress constituted a committee, the flag recommended was a saffron flag. This flag was rejected by Nehru as “communal”.

TrueIndology: In 1931, when congress constituted a committee, the flag recommended was a saffron flag. This flag was rejeted by Nehru as "communal".

Reality: Nehru was part of the seven member committee which recommended the saffron flag.

The quote in TrueIndology’s tweet has been taken from a book called “Glimpses of Indian National Congress: From Inception to Attainment of Freedom” by TN Kundra and published in 1996. The quote is from pages 142 and 143, a screenshot of which can be seen below. The copy of book available on Google doesn’t carry the image of the flag shown in TrueIndology’s tweet.

A seven member committee was indeed formed to deliberate upon the flag. According to a report of the National Flag Committee, the committee included Sardar Vallabhai Patel, Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad, Master Tara Singh, Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru, Principal D.B. Kalelker, Dr. N.S. Hardiker and Dr. Pattabhi Sitaramayya.

Report of the National Flag committee: At a meeting of the working committee of the INdian national contress held on 2nd april 1931 at Karachi, a resolution was passed apointing a committee of seven persons to examine the objections to the national flag now in voge and disapproval to the tricolour flag accused of being communal and hence recommended a flag for the acceptance of the Congress. The committee included sardar vallabbhai patel, maulana abdul kalam azad, jawahar lal nehru

As the above report states, it was the tricolour which was initially rejected as communal and not the saffron flag. As a result, a committee was formed to examine the objections to the tricolour. The committee felt that multiple colours in the flag were being given various interpretations including religious connotations which was a cause of much consternation among people and hence the 7 member committee recommended a single colour flag, a Saffron flag. This decision of recommending a saffron flag was a unanimous decision of the committee, which included Pandit Nehru.

On the questions of colors and device of the National Flag, there is unanimous opinion that the National Flag should be of a single color except for the color of its de vice. If there is one color wholeheartedly accepted by the Indians in the context of its ancient tradition it is the Kesari or saffron color.Hence it is felt that the flag should be of Kesari color and the device should be that of charkha which should be i n blue.The Committee recommend Kesari or Saffron color for the National Flag, with blue Charkha at the left top quarter and wheel towards the flagstaff.

Thus, TrueIndology’s claim that Nehru rejected the saffron flag by branding the colour as communal is untrue.

Many in Congress/RSS preferred Bhagwa. Nehru was stifling the diversity of flags and imposing his version of secularist flag over everyone

Rebuttal

In TrueIndology’s rebuttal, Claim 2 and Claim 7 published in the part 1 of our exposé have been contested. While trying to defend its claims, TrueIndology has provided further proof of its fakery.

Case 7

Claim (1 & 2): Ganesha on the footsteps of Ghazni mosque/A marble statue of 3 headed Brahma discovered on the footsteps of the old Friday mosque in Ghazni, Afghanistan.

Trueindology, brahma in 2016, Ganesha in 2017

Alt News claims: This statue of Brahma was not found on the footsteps of a mosque.

TrueIndology counterclaim: Statue was found on the entrance of the royal Ghaznavid Mosque inside the palace of Sultan Mas’ud III.

Reality: TrueIndology provides documentation that the statue was found in northern part of the hall. UNESCO documentation further shows how the mosque was near the King’s room.

Firstly, TrueIndology’s rebuttal calmly skips over the fact that the Twitter account was claiming the same statue to be both Ganesha and Brahma. TrueIndology has exhibited such behaviour in multiple cases like passing off a Dronacharya picture as that of Bhai Singha Purohit in Case 11 or passing off an ivory statue of Buddha as that of Hindu Shahi King of Gandhara in Case 13.

Regarding TrueIndology’s claims that the Brahma statue was found at the entrance of the royal Ghaznavid Mosque, TrueIndology article refers to work by Japanese Archaeologist Kuwayama in her book ‘Across the Hindukush (2002)’ which TrueIndology has also previously tweeted. In this, it can be clearly seen that the statue was found “in the northern part of the hall at the palace of Sultan Mas’ud III” (underlined with red).

Further, in documentation available on Ghazni on UNESCO’s website, it is clearly mentioned on Page 23 in which they describe the palace and state that the mosque was discovered near the King’s room.

Large mosque was also discovered not far from the King's main room

Considering that the statue was discovered in northern part of the central hall and the mosque was near the King’s room, the statue could not have been discovered at the footsteps of the mosque.

This demolishes TrueIndology’s first rebuttal.

Case 2

Claim: 1000 yr old Varun Dev temple in Karachi (Pakistan) now used as a toilet

1000 year old Varun Dev Temple in Karachi (Pakistan) now used as toilets for tourists

Alt News Claim: The Varun Dev temple located in Manora island near Karachi is under restoration and not being used as a toilet.

TrueIndology counterclaim: Parts of temple were used as toilet until Feb 2016.

Reality: TrueIndology’s tweet on June 2, 2017 claims that the temple is being used as a toilet “now”. TrueIndology failed to provide any evidence of it being used a toilet “now”. In fact, TrueIndology’s counter claim is contradictory to the original claim.

This whole story is based on a Daily Times report on March 12, 2008 in Daily Times where it was stated that “temple’s decayed appearance reflects a lack of care, and its walls and rooms serve as a toilet for visitors to Manora’s sandy beach“. The historian in TrueIndology presents an article that is 9 years and 3 months old as the present status of the temple via the tweet on June 2, 2017 despite there being ample evidence of the temple having gone through renovation and restoration.

In Dec 2015, the temple received $250,000 funding from the US Ambassador Fund for Cultural Preservation (AFCP) and its restoration started in collaboration with the Sindh Exploration and Adventure Society (SEAS).

April 2017 story in Daily Times states, “Consul General Grace Shelton visited the Shri Varun Dev Mandir – a historic Hindu temple dedicated to the Lord of the Seas (Varuna) and believed to be the only temple dedicated to the Lord of the Seas in Pakistan – today at Manora Island. She appreciated the preservation efforts for the temple, made by Sindh Exploration and Adventure Society (SEAS) under a U.S. government-funded project.

It is amply clear that TrueIndology’s claim on June 2, 2017, of the temple being used as toilet “now” is a complete misrepresentation of history as a 2008 article is being cited to describe a situation in 2017.

TrueIndology supporters

In all, Alt News has now presented 17 cases where TrueIndology has misrepresented history. We have also shown above how TrueIndology’s rebuttal was self-contradictory and self-defeating. Despite such monumental skulduggery on the part of TrueIndology, this anonymous Twitter account found many sympathizers. We are listing a few of the reactions in support of TrueIndology.

Rahul Raj bhak_sala More power to @TrueIndology, The handle has rattled so many pseudo historians.

Ashu Muglikar_ Dosto I firmly believe that Librandus are against the soon to be launched book by TrueIndology which will bust their decade of lies.

Yogini: They are attacking TrueIndology like street dogs. There will be fake FB pages & fake handles run by 4 diff attacking like hyenas.

Nupur Jhunjhunwala UnsubtleDesi Stand firm n steady ur heart @TrueIndology. Attacks will worsen once your book is out. But in the end, your credibility will stand untainted

R Jagannathan trueindology

From Editorial Director of Swarajya Magazine R Jagannathan to OpIndia Co-Founder Rahul Raj (@bhak_sala), many prominent right-wingers on Twitter came out in support of TrueIndology. However, it is perplexing as to why these people are staking their reputations for an anonymous Twitter account which is clearly duplicitous.

Unless TrueIndology starts faking history again or updates the blog post which is stuck at “To be continued”, this will be the last part of the TrueIndology series. Links to the previous two parts are provided below.

Link to Part 1 of TrueIndology or TrueFraudology => https://go.altnews.in/2s5aLqa
Link to Part 2 of TrueIndology or TrueFraudology => https://go.altnews.in/2tqYF8G
You could follow Alt News posts either via our Facebook page or by following us on Twitter or by subscribing to our E-mail updates.


Leave a Reply

12 Comments on "TrueIndology or TrueFraudology – Part 3 – Exposing more fakery and a rebuttal"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Asif
Guest

Hi ! Just wan to say carry on with good work . We are in time where very few people knows the fact and even fewer writes about it. You are among those few elites.

Abdul
Guest

They must change their name to TrueLies Indology…

Amit Misra
Guest

The Varun temple, says the offender in his WordPress blog, can no more be used as a temple because people (Muslims?) urinated in the ruins up to Feb 2016. Hypocrisy– if we start counting how many remains of temples of similar antiquity within the territory of the Indian Union have been urinated upon, defecated upon, vandalised, despoiled and otherwise treated with the same unconcern as shown by the people who visited the Varun temple, we Indians, Hindus or not, will be the bigger offenders. BTW, is Varun worshiped anymore, anywhere in India? Is Indra, for that? 🙂

Meghna Nayak
Guest

Very important work, an asset to the journalistic community. Thank you for your persistence and excellent research.

better days
Guest

u rock,simply!!

Huzaifa
Guest
Thank you for your effortless and great work. I’ve read your series on exposing TrueIndology and also read his rebuttals (including the latest one) as well. I found that his rebuttals were vague, redundant and didn’t have a solid argument or proof to discredit your expose. Also, not once did he use your actual name (AltNews) in his rebuttal. He got reduced to using terms such as rag news, truth rag, ignoramuses, propaganda rag, post truth peddler, FakeNews, rag, etc. I can continue writing the expletives but you get the picture. It just goes out to show his “professionalism”. A… Read more »
Twig
Guest

No HuZaifa! Infact I give TrueIndology the prize here, as he his rebuttal was eloborate and clearly showed the sources, gave context. The problem with Alt News “Expose” or whatever is not really an expose. Ofcourse, TrueIndology’s rebuttal is filled with Anger words, but that is besides the point he is making.
In short, TrueIndology’s textual content has nowhere been contested strongly. Whatever “Expose” has been done here is the images depicted. TrueIndology’s rebutall was very satisfactory in almost all the cases.
I had to be extremely honest to arrive at this conclusion.

SKR
Guest
shom raturi
Guest
यह इतिहास है कि खान अब्दुल गफ्फार खान पाकिस्तान के साथ नही रहना चाहते थे बल्कि वे भारत के साथ रहना चाहते थे और उनके स्वयंसेवक खुदाई खिदमतगारों के ऊपर गोलियां चलाई गई थी,जहां तक फोटो की बात है ऐसी फोटो प्रतीकात्मक रूप से इतिहास में प्रयुक्त होती हैं यह कोई अकेली घटना नही है।दूसरी बात वरुण देव मन्दिर की है आपने कोई साक्ष्य नही दिया कि उसे टॉयलेट के रूप में यूज़ नही किया जाता ,महज यूनेस्को से फण्ड मिलना इस बात का साक्ष्य नही है कि वहां यह प्रथा बन्द हो गयी।पाकिस्तान को आतंकवाद खत्म करने के लिए… Read more »
Gaurav
Guest

Ture Indology has shown here that your claims are malicious and false.

Can you respond and expose him with a part 4 because he has exposed all your lies in the 3 part series and people will stop believing you, if you don’t expose him??

Does it Matter
Guest

Pratik what about “The Neolithic stuff”?? You didn,t come up with any explanation though (specifically to his rebuttel)??

Sajid
Guest

Please use the word self brainwashed next time to define those who don’t believe even if you present facts and truth.

wpDiscuz